Legal Hottips - January 7,
2008
This Legal Hottips article may be reprinted only if it is reprinted in
its entirety, including the disclaimers above and below the Hotline
questions and answers. The Wisconsin REALTORS® Association Best of
the Legal Hotline Service is an educational resource intended to keep
the Association abreast of legal developments and concerns involving
real estate practice in Wisconsin. We look forward to your input
regarding the service, especially regarding the types of topics you
would like covered.
1.) Agency - License Law/Code of Ethics
QUESTION:
Re: Article 16 of the Code of Ethics. Standard of
Practice 16-13 says that before providing substantive services to
prospects, REALTORS® shall ask prospects whether they are a party
to any exclusive representation agreement.
Does this mean that when an agent shows property to a
buyer for the first time, the agent Does should be asking them if they
have a buyer agency agreement with another REALTOR®?
ANSWER:
Yes, an agent should inquire as to whether a party is
under contract with any other real estate agent before showing
properties to that party. If the party does have a buyer agency
agreement, the agent should ask if the party wants to work with the
buyer's agent or that agent.
READ MORE ABOUT IT:
See pages 5-7 of Legal Update 03.02, "Professional
Standard Changes for 2003," online at www.wra.org/LU0302, for further
discussion.
2.) General Real Estate - Foreclosure
QUESTION:
A customer called who realizes that a property is going
into foreclosure and wants to write an offer as soon as it is
available. It turns out that he had written an offer on the same
property previously with another agent before it became a foreclosure
property. Since the bank is now the seller, can the buyer write the
offer with a different agent?
ANSWER:
The foreclosure voided the prior listing contract and
since there is now a new owner, the buyer may work with any agent.
READ MORE ABOUT IT:
See Legal Update 99.05, "Mortgage Foreclosures," online at www.wra.org/LU9905.
3.) Listing Contracts - Termination/Withdrawal
QUESTION:
The broker has listed a property as of December 24,
2007. The seller e-mailed and phoned the previous listing broker three
times to expire the previous listing. The previous broker has not
responded to any of the messages. The previous listing was an
unserviced listing. How to proceed?
ANSWER:
A licensee who coaches a seller about how to terminate a
listing or a buyer about how to terminate a buyer agency contract may
be accused of license law and ethical violations and sued in court for
damages.
Such conduct may be viewed as giving legal advice in
violation of Wis. Admin. Code § RL 24.06(1) and Article 13 of the
Code of Ethics. It also may be seen as interference with the other
broker's agency contract in violation of Article 16 of the Code of
Ethics. A person who interferes with a contract may also be sued in
civil court if damages can be proved.
The following information is provided for the broker's
information only. The seller may be referred to legal counsel or to the
previous broker to discuss the seller's rights and obligations per the
previous listing contract.
Regardless of the type of listing, sellers have the
power to revoke a listing contract at any time. The listing is a
personal services contract which establishes a fiduciary relationship
of trust and confidence with the broker. Because the contract reflects
the agency relationship, the seller possesses the power to revoke or
terminate the listing contract at any time. The seller (the principal)
cannot be compelled to remain in the agency relationship with the
broker (the agent) with whom the seller no longer wishes to work.
The power to revoke or cancel the listing contract,
however, must be distinguished from the right to do so. The seller
always has the power to cancel the listing contract but may not have
the right to declare an early termination to the listing. Canceling the
listing before its expiration date will typically constitute a breach
of the contract terms and thus violate the broker's rights. The broker
may then demand compensation for the damages sustained as a result of
the early listing cancellation. The broker cannot, however, sue the
seller for specific performance because of the agency relationship.
These damages may include the costs of advertising,
reimbursement for other expenses incurred by the broker in the process
of listing and marketing the property, and the value of services
rendered, assuming the broker can sufficiently prove this. Commission
will be due only if the broker can prove that the broker had procured a
buyer ready, willing and able to purchase the property upon the terms
and conditions specified in the listing contract, or on terms otherwise
acceptable to the seller.
Note that some brokers are adding provisions to their
listing contracts specifically describing a procedure for the early
termination of the listing. If so, as long as the seller follows the
contract provisions for termination, the seller may generally cancel
the listing without fear of being charged for any damages. That is not
the case, however, if the early termination provision calls for an
early termination fee or other damages.
Note also that the seller may cancel the listing without
risk of damages if the termination is for cause. For example, if the
listing broker fails to perform according to the terms of the listing
contract or otherwise fails to act in good faith, then the seller will
have the right, not just the power, to terminate the listing. Then the
broker cannot claim any damages based upon the early termination
because the broker was in breach of contract.
Under the 1999 version of the WB-1 residential listing
contract, the seller may terminate the listing by verbal notice, by
written letter or notice, or by amendment of the listing contract
(changing the expiration date to a current date). Upon receipt of such
notice from the seller, the broker has no right to refuse the seller or
exact any price or penalty for the cancellation unless originally
stated in the listing contract (other than the action for damages
discussed above). [Note that written notice of termination will be
required under the 2008 listings.]
Once the seller has notified the broker that the listing
is terminated, preferably in writing, the seller is free to list the
property with another broker. The first listing broker will have no
further rights with respect to the listing, other than any listing
protection or override rights it establishes with respect to properly
qualified buyers.
READ MORE ABOUT IT:
More information about termination of listings is
available in the September 2006 Broker Supervision Newsletter at www.wra.org/BSNsept06.
4.) Licensing Issues - Miscellaneous
QUESTION:
The agent has not paid his 2008 REALTOR® dues. Is
there a conflict with the agent holding an open house this weekend?
ANSWER:
Provided the agent's license is current with the
Department of Regulation and Licensing (DRL) and there is no conflict
with his company policy, the agent may hold the open house. DRL
licensing, not REALTOR® membership, determines an agent's ability
to legally practice real estate, subject to broker policy. Because the
agent's REALTOR® membership has not been renewed, however, the
agent should avoid any representation that he is a REALTOR®.
READ MORE ABOUT IT:
See the Membership Overview at http://www.wra.org/membership_info/membership_info.htm.
5.) Advertising - Miscellaneous Advertising Issues
QUESTION:
Re: Advertising. The broker is offering a discount
business model. Can the broker put in an ad, "list your home on XXXX WI
MLS for as low as $400, call for details?"
ANSWER:
All advertising must comply with Wis. Admin. Code §
RL 24.04, Article 12 of the Code of Ethics and company advertising
policy. Licensees may not advertise in a manner that is false,
deceptive or misleading and advertising must portray a true picture.
An advertisement should not imply that the seller
personally has access to the MLS for $400. The MLS is, in part, a
means by which authorized MLS participants make offers of cooperation
and compensation to other participants.
The broker's advertising content may be drafted and then
reviewed by the company's supervising broker or legal counsel to assure
compliance with company policy, § RL 24.04 and Article
12.
READ MORE ABOUT IT:
See the February 2006 Legal Update, "Real Estate
Advertising," online at www.wra.org/LU0602.
NEW WB-1 and WB-36
Recently, the Residential Listing Contract (WB-1) and
Buyer Agency/Tenant Representation Agreement (WB-36) were finalized by
the Department of Regulation and Licensing. Optional and mandatory use
dates are January 1, 2008 and July 1, 2008, respectively. The forms are
currently being printed and will be available for shipping Wednesday.
The ZipForm library is also being updated and is expected out later
this week. For more information on the form revisions and a
line-by-line video presentation by Attorney Dave Sayas, visit www.wra.org/formsupdate.
This Wisconsin REALTORS® Association
Best of the Legal Hotline service is provided for you by the WRA's
Legal Affairs Department. The service should be considered a general
statement of applicable legal principles. Given this format, it is
impossible to fully address all potential legal issues which might
apply in any particular situation. A determination of any individual's
legal rights in a transaction can only be obtained after complete
analysis of the law and its applicability to the particular fact
situation. Please contact the WRA Legal Hotline if additional
information is needed, or private counsel, if legal advice is needed.
Thank you for using the Wisconsin REALTORS® Association Best of the
Legal Hotline service.
Debbi Conrad
Director of Legal Affairs
Wisconsin
REALTORS® Association
4801 Forest Run Road Suite 201
Madison, WI 53704
Phone: 608-241-2047; 800-279-1972
Fax: 608-242-2279
Copyright 1998 - 2008 Wisconsin REALTORS® Association
|