Legal Hottips - June 16,
2008
This Legal Hottips article may be reprinted only if it is reprinted in
its entirety, including the disclaimers above and below the Hotline
questions and answers. The Wisconsin REALTORS® Association Best of
the Legal Hotline Service is an educational resource intended to keep
the Association abreast of legal developments and concerns involving
real estate practice in Wisconsin. We look forward to your input
regarding the service, especially regarding the types of topics you
would like covered.
1.) Disclosure - Material Adverse Facts; Disclosure -
Mutual Mistake of Fact
QUESTION:
A mound system septic inspection was conducted on the
seller's bi-level home with four bedrooms. The mound system test shows
it is only a three-bedroom septic system. How to notify the buyer?
Should an amendment be done?
ANSWER:
If an agent knows or is aware of information suggesting
the possibility of a material adverse fact, Wis. Admin. Code
§ RL 24.07(3) states that the agent will be practicing competently
if the agent makes timely written disclosure of the information
suggesting the material adverse fact to all parties to the transaction,
recommends the parties obtain expert assistance to inspect or
investigate for the possible material adverse fact, and, if directed by
the parties, draft appropriate inspection or investigation
contingencies. The duty to disclose has priority over any duty owed to
the agent's client.
When both parties are mistaken as to a basic factual assumption on
which the contract was made, in this instance the capacity and
suitability of the mound system, and the mistake has a material effect
on their performances, the contract may be voidable by the party
adversely affected.
Under this mutual mistake theory, both parties must have been mistaken.
A mistake by only one of the parties makes a contract voidable only if
the party who causes the mistake has reason to know the other party is
proceeding based on that mistake. The mistake must be based upon a past
or present fact. Both parties should be referred to legal counsel to
determine their legal rights in this transaction.
2.) Offer to Purchase - Delivery
QUESTION:
Is there any liability entailed in being the recipient
for delivery for a party in an offer to purchase? In particular, is
there liability associated with being the buyer's recipient for
delivery in the WB-14 Residential Condominium Offer to Purchase?
ANSWER:
When a broker agrees to use the broker's mailing address
or fax number as the destination for delivery to a party, the broker
accepts the responsibility to handle documents mailed or delivered to
the broker on behalf of the seller in a timely and professional manner.
The same may be said when the company or an agent is named as a party's
recipient for delivery. A broker's acceptance of these roles creates
new responsibilities on the part of the broker to make sure that
notices and other documents received on behalf of a party are promptly
and competently processed and presented to the party. Depending upon
the facts and circumstances, the broker typically must act swiftly
because the party often is required to give a quick response to the
other party. Arguably there may be some liability on the part of a
broker who fails to timely process and deliver critical materials.
In the recent unpublished case of Sam F & B v. Molepske (Ct. App. 2007, Appeal No. 2007AP1294), online at http://www.wisbar.org/res/capp/2007/2007ap001294.htm,
both the circuit court and the Court of Appeals concluded that the
condominium offer to purchase unambiguously designated the agent as the
buyers' recipient for delivery. The courts interpreted this to mean
that delivery of the condominium disclosure materials was effective
upon delivery to the agent and that the buyers had received the
materials upon receipt by the agent. The agent's receipt of the
disclosure materials, not the buyers' actual receipt in Florida 11 days
later, started the clock on the time frame for the buyer' Wis. Stat.
§ 703.33(4) rescission rights according to the courts.
Agents wishing to avoid this sort of predicament should
do as the court suggests in the Molepske opinion: do not be the buyer's
recipient for delivery, or do so only with the understanding that
documents delivered to them, particularly the condominium disclosure
documents, must be immediately presented to the buyers. Agents who
still wish to serve as the buyer's recipient for delivery in a
condominium offer to purchase may wish to add language in additional
provisions to help ensure that the buyer's Wis. Stat. § 703.33(4)
rescission rights are not triggered until the buyer's actual receipt of
the disclosure materials. Such a provision might state something to the
effect of, "Buyer shall not be deemed to have received the Condominium
Disclosures described on lines 81-94 until Buyer has actually,
physically received the Condominium Disclosures, notwithstanding the
provisions on lines 25-36 of the Offer." Agents in this situation would
be well-advised to consult with private legal counsel regarding any
such provision that they wish to insert in the WB-14 offer to help
ensure maximum protection from risk of liability.
3.) Disclosure - Lead-Based Paint; Disclosure - Real
Estate Condition Report
QUESTION:
Re: Listing a property that is held in a trust. The
woman who owns the property is 96 years old and in a nursing home. Is a
real estate condition report (RECR) and a lead-based paint (LBP)
addendum required?
ANSWER:
All sellers subject to Wis. Stat. Chapter 709, whether
broker assisted or FSBO, must complete a Chapter 709 RECR or risk
rescission of the offer to purchase. Chapter 709 generally applies to
all persons who transfer real estate containing one to four dwelling
units, including condominium units, time share property, living
quarters in a commercial property, etc. Chapter 709 does not apply to
(1) personal representatives, trustees, conservators and other
fiduciaries appointed by or subject to supervision by the court, but
only if those persons have never occupied the property (Note this does
not include powers of attorneys); (2) real estate which has not been
inhabited, e.g. new construction; and (3) transfers exempt from the
real estate transfer fee, e.g. between spouses, foreclosures, probate
transfers, etc. (Note: this does not include sales of foreclosed
properties).
A seller can either (a) complete the RECR to the best of
his or her knowledge, (b) retain a professional to provide an
inspection report to be used as the basis for completing the RECR, (c)
refuse to complete the RECR and sell "as is," risking buyer rescission,
or (d) refuse to complete the RECR and sell "as is," refusing to accept
any offers from buyers who do not waive their Chapter 709 rescission
rights.
Wis. Stat. § 709.08 allows a buyer to waive the
right to receive a RECR and the right to rescind the offer based upon
the content of the RECR. Buyers should be advised to confer with legal
counsel before waiving any legal rights - REALTORS® cannot provide
legal advice of this sort. However, even with those waivers, a seller
may be obligated in certain situations, under common law, to disclose
material defects that the buyer may not be able to discover (see the
discussion of the Green Springs Farm v. Spring Green
Associates Ltd Partnership case on page 9 of Legal Update
02.07, "Duty to Disclose," online at www.wra.org/LU0207).
With respect to the federal LBP disclosure rule and
Addendum S, in cases where a trustee has been given authority to sell
target housing by the beneficiaries of the trust, the trustee would
have the responsibility to comply with the requirements of this rule.
Otherwise, the responsibility would rest with the beneficiaries of the
trust.
4.) Advertising - Miscellaneous Advertising Issues
QUESTION:
Re: Ethical marketing practices for brokers. A real
estate brokerage has made up dozens and dozens of small signs (like the
yard signs supporting a candidate during a political campaign) and
blanketed them all over several municipalities, placing them at various
intersections, right-of-ways, freeway entrances/exits, etc. to
advertise their company and services. Certainly municipalities most
likely have ordinances forbidding that type of blanket marketing and
against the placing signs on other people's property without their
permission, whether they choose to enforce the ordinances or not. With
the extent of marketing this company has done with these signs, it is
highly unlikely/impossible that permission was granted, and certainly
not likely that permission would have been granted if the property
owners had been asked. Is this broker conducting illegal marketing
practices and does it violate the REALTOR® Code of Ethics? Does the
broker have a legitimate complaint to get this other broker to stop
this marketing practice?
ANSWER:
On its face this set of circumstances does not violate
any specific article of the Code of Ethics.
The licensee may contact the local municipalities to
inquire about the placement of signs and other marketing materials on
private property and in the public right-of-way. Such an inquiry and/or
a formal complaint may cause the local municipalities to demand that
the broker cease all marketing in such locations. Of course, this is
presuming the local municipalities in question have such
ordinances.
5.) Fair Housing - Advertising
QUESTION:
An apartment building has open stairways and there is a
second floor unit. A family with young children is looking at it. It is
somewhat of a safety hazard with the open stairways and a couple of
balconies that are two stories up. Is it the broker's place to tell
them whether or not it is safe for their children?
ANSWER:
The broker must tread lightly because he wants to make
sure he is not representing or implying that families with young
children are not welcome to live on the second floor. That would be a
discrimination complaint waiting to happen. It is against federal and
Wisconsin fair housing law to limit the floors on which families and
children may live. The broker may politely point out in a general
manner, not specific to children, the safety hazards of an open
stairway on the second floor.
It would be most prudent, however, to not mention it
because the family may perceive adverse implications or innuendoes in
even innocent statements and file a complaint. The agent's
well-intentioned concern could be characterized as a subtle form of
steering: the agent decides on behalf of the buyer that they need to be
warned of this hazard. Unless the agent points out the safety concern
to all potential tenants, it is best to not mention it.
Real Estate Continuing Education/License Renewal
Deadlines
Remember that the deadline for real estate continuing education (CE)
and license renewal this year is December 14, 2008, not December 31 as
it would have been on the old renewal schedules. The Department of
Regulation and Licensing has implemented staggered renewal dates among
the various professions that it regulates, which is why this date has
been changed.
Also please be reminded that REALTORS® need to
complete Quadrennial Ethics Training by December 31, 2008. The
quadrennial ethics training requirements are incorporated in the
2007-2008 CE Course 4 offered by the WRA. If you takeA free online
quadrennial ethics course also is available at online at http://rodomino.realtor.org/mempolweb.nsf/pages/quadrennialethicstrainingcourse.
The NAR online course may be customized for a residential or commercial
real estate emphasis.
Learn how to Stage your Properties to Compete in
the Market
On August 8, 2008, Martha Webb will present a program
"Positioning Properties to Compete in the Market" at the Kalahari
Resort in Wisconsin Dells. Staging is receiving national attention as
an established trend in real estate. Now is the time to develop the
knowledge and skills to integrate staging into your business. This
course is an in-depth study of the staging process designed to
integrate staging, pricing and developing strategic marketing skills.
Completion of this course qualifies as a one-day CRS Elective as well
as the Certified Home Marketing Specialist designation (CHMS).
For more information and to register for the Positioning
Properties to Compete in the Market program, visit: www.wra.org/crscourses.
This Wisconsin REALTORS® Association
Best of the Legal Hotline service is provided for you by the WRA's
Legal Affairs Department. The service should be considered a general
statement of applicable legal principles. Given this format, it is
impossible to fully address all potential legal issues which might
apply in any particular situation. A determination of any individual's
legal rights in a transaction can only be obtained after complete
analysis of the law and its applicability to the particular fact
situation. Please contact the WRA Legal Hotline if additional
information is needed, or private counsel, if legal advice is needed.
Thank you for using the Wisconsin REALTORS® Association Best of the
Legal Hotline service.
Debbi Conrad
Director of Legal Affairs
Wisconsin
REALTORS® Association
4801 Forest Run Road Suite 201
Madison, WI 53704
Phone: 608-241-2047; 800-279-1972
Fax: 608-242-2279
Copyright 1998 - 2008 Wisconsin REALTORS® Association
|